Review





Similar Products

lattice lightsheet 7 microscope  (Carl Zeiss)
90
Carl Zeiss lattice lightsheet 7 microscope
Lattice Lightsheet 7 Microscope, supplied by Carl Zeiss, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/lattice+lightsheet+microscope/axio+microscope+observer+z1+%CE%B2/pm40461567-240-3-2
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
lattice lightsheet 7 microscope - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
lattice lightsheet microscope  (Carl Zeiss)
90
Carl Zeiss lattice lightsheet microscope
Dorsal progenitor ablation does not affect the gene expression pattern or cell division levels in the tailbud. (A,B) Mean (average) projection through the midline of representative images of the sox2/tbxta expression pattern in control (A) and ablated (B), embryos over time. (B) Initial disruption of the pattern can be seen in ablated embryos at 0 h post-ablation (white dashed outline). By 4 h, and up to 8 h, post-ablation the gene expression pattern is comparable to control embryos. (C) Average map of the sox2 + /tbxta + cells from tailbuds at each time point in control and ablated embryos. The axes show the distribution of these cells in the dorsal-ventral and anterior-posterior axes and the average level of sox2 versus tbxta expression within 11 µm of each point. There is no significant change in the average maps between control and ablated embryos. (D) Number of sox2/tbxta double-positive nuclei in each tailbud. Ablation causes a significant drop in the number of nuclei at 0 h post-ablation compared to controls. A significant reduction remains at 4 h post-ablation compared to controls. 0 h: ablated, n =10; control, n =8. 1 h: ablated, n =11, control, n =9. 4 h: ablated, n =10; control, n =9. 8 h: ablated, n =3; control, n =3. (E) Long-term <t>lightsheet</t> imaging of an ablated embryo (white dashed circle) and a stage-matched control allows manual identification of dividing cells (cyan dashed circles). (F) There is no clear difference between the number of divisions in ablated and control embryos over 4 h. Ablated, n =1; control, n =1. Conditions were compared using Mann–Whitney-Wilcoxon test. * P ≤0.05.
Lattice Lightsheet Microscope, supplied by Carl Zeiss, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/lattice+lightsheet+microscope/axio+microscope+observer+z1+%CE%B2/pmc11829759-341-4-4
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
lattice lightsheet microscope - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
lattice lightsheet 7 microscope 40× objective  (Carl Zeiss)
90
Carl Zeiss lattice lightsheet 7 microscope 40× objective
Dorsal progenitor ablation does not affect the gene expression pattern or cell division levels in the tailbud. (A,B) Mean (average) projection through the midline of representative images of the sox2/tbxta expression pattern in control (A) and ablated (B), embryos over time. (B) Initial disruption of the pattern can be seen in ablated embryos at 0 h post-ablation (white dashed outline). By 4 h, and up to 8 h, post-ablation the gene expression pattern is comparable to control embryos. (C) Average map of the sox2 + /tbxta + cells from tailbuds at each time point in control and ablated embryos. The axes show the distribution of these cells in the dorsal-ventral and anterior-posterior axes and the average level of sox2 versus tbxta expression within 11 µm of each point. There is no significant change in the average maps between control and ablated embryos. (D) Number of sox2/tbxta double-positive nuclei in each tailbud. Ablation causes a significant drop in the number of nuclei at 0 h post-ablation compared to controls. A significant reduction remains at 4 h post-ablation compared to controls. 0 h: ablated, n =10; control, n =8. 1 h: ablated, n =11, control, n =9. 4 h: ablated, n =10; control, n =9. 8 h: ablated, n =3; control, n =3. (E) Long-term <t>lightsheet</t> imaging of an ablated embryo (white dashed circle) and a stage-matched control allows manual identification of dividing cells (cyan dashed circles). (F) There is no clear difference between the number of divisions in ablated and control embryos over 4 h. Ablated, n =1; control, n =1. Conditions were compared using Mann–Whitney-Wilcoxon test. * P ≤0.05.
Lattice Lightsheet 7 Microscope 40× Objective, supplied by Carl Zeiss, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/lattice+lightsheet+microscope/axio+microscope+observer+z1+%CE%B2/pm39083627-99-31-40
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
lattice lightsheet 7 microscope 40× objective - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
lattice lightsheet 7 microscope (llsm  (Carl Zeiss)
90
Carl Zeiss lattice lightsheet 7 microscope (llsm
Dorsal progenitor ablation does not affect the gene expression pattern or cell division levels in the tailbud. (A,B) Mean (average) projection through the midline of representative images of the sox2/tbxta expression pattern in control (A) and ablated (B), embryos over time. (B) Initial disruption of the pattern can be seen in ablated embryos at 0 h post-ablation (white dashed outline). By 4 h, and up to 8 h, post-ablation the gene expression pattern is comparable to control embryos. (C) Average map of the sox2 + /tbxta + cells from tailbuds at each time point in control and ablated embryos. The axes show the distribution of these cells in the dorsal-ventral and anterior-posterior axes and the average level of sox2 versus tbxta expression within 11 µm of each point. There is no significant change in the average maps between control and ablated embryos. (D) Number of sox2/tbxta double-positive nuclei in each tailbud. Ablation causes a significant drop in the number of nuclei at 0 h post-ablation compared to controls. A significant reduction remains at 4 h post-ablation compared to controls. 0 h: ablated, n =10; control, n =8. 1 h: ablated, n =11, control, n =9. 4 h: ablated, n =10; control, n =9. 8 h: ablated, n =3; control, n =3. (E) Long-term <t>lightsheet</t> imaging of an ablated embryo (white dashed circle) and a stage-matched control allows manual identification of dividing cells (cyan dashed circles). (F) There is no clear difference between the number of divisions in ablated and control embryos over 4 h. Ablated, n =1; control, n =1. Conditions were compared using Mann–Whitney-Wilcoxon test. * P ≤0.05.
Lattice Lightsheet 7 Microscope (Llsm, supplied by Carl Zeiss, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/lattice+lightsheet+microscope/axio+microscope+observer+z1+%CE%B2/pm38843837-405-36-35
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
lattice lightsheet 7 microscope (llsm - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
lattice lightsheet microscope 7  (Carl Zeiss)
90
Carl Zeiss lattice lightsheet microscope 7
Dorsal progenitor ablation does not affect the gene expression pattern or cell division levels in the tailbud. (A,B) Mean (average) projection through the midline of representative images of the sox2/tbxta expression pattern in control (A) and ablated (B), embryos over time. (B) Initial disruption of the pattern can be seen in ablated embryos at 0 h post-ablation (white dashed outline). By 4 h, and up to 8 h, post-ablation the gene expression pattern is comparable to control embryos. (C) Average map of the sox2 + /tbxta + cells from tailbuds at each time point in control and ablated embryos. The axes show the distribution of these cells in the dorsal-ventral and anterior-posterior axes and the average level of sox2 versus tbxta expression within 11 µm of each point. There is no significant change in the average maps between control and ablated embryos. (D) Number of sox2/tbxta double-positive nuclei in each tailbud. Ablation causes a significant drop in the number of nuclei at 0 h post-ablation compared to controls. A significant reduction remains at 4 h post-ablation compared to controls. 0 h: ablated, n =10; control, n =8. 1 h: ablated, n =11, control, n =9. 4 h: ablated, n =10; control, n =9. 8 h: ablated, n =3; control, n =3. (E) Long-term <t>lightsheet</t> imaging of an ablated embryo (white dashed circle) and a stage-matched control allows manual identification of dividing cells (cyan dashed circles). (F) There is no clear difference between the number of divisions in ablated and control embryos over 4 h. Ablated, n =1; control, n =1. Conditions were compared using Mann–Whitney-Wilcoxon test. * P ≤0.05.
Lattice Lightsheet Microscope 7, supplied by Carl Zeiss, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/lattice+lightsheet+microscope/axio+microscope+observer+z1+%CE%B2/bio_rxiv__2024__05__03__592249-535-5-11
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
lattice lightsheet microscope 7 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Dorsal progenitor ablation does not affect the gene expression pattern or cell division levels in the tailbud. (A,B) Mean (average) projection through the midline of representative images of the sox2/tbxta expression pattern in control (A) and ablated (B), embryos over time. (B) Initial disruption of the pattern can be seen in ablated embryos at 0 h post-ablation (white dashed outline). By 4 h, and up to 8 h, post-ablation the gene expression pattern is comparable to control embryos. (C) Average map of the sox2 + /tbxta + cells from tailbuds at each time point in control and ablated embryos. The axes show the distribution of these cells in the dorsal-ventral and anterior-posterior axes and the average level of sox2 versus tbxta expression within 11 µm of each point. There is no significant change in the average maps between control and ablated embryos. (D) Number of sox2/tbxta double-positive nuclei in each tailbud. Ablation causes a significant drop in the number of nuclei at 0 h post-ablation compared to controls. A significant reduction remains at 4 h post-ablation compared to controls. 0 h: ablated, n =10; control, n =8. 1 h: ablated, n =11, control, n =9. 4 h: ablated, n =10; control, n =9. 8 h: ablated, n =3; control, n =3. (E) Long-term lightsheet imaging of an ablated embryo (white dashed circle) and a stage-matched control allows manual identification of dividing cells (cyan dashed circles). (F) There is no clear difference between the number of divisions in ablated and control embryos over 4 h. Ablated, n =1; control, n =1. Conditions were compared using Mann–Whitney-Wilcoxon test. * P ≤0.05.

Journal: Development (Cambridge, England)

Article Title: Spinal cord elongation enables proportional regulation of the zebrafish posterior body

doi: 10.1242/dev.204438

Figure Lengend Snippet: Dorsal progenitor ablation does not affect the gene expression pattern or cell division levels in the tailbud. (A,B) Mean (average) projection through the midline of representative images of the sox2/tbxta expression pattern in control (A) and ablated (B), embryos over time. (B) Initial disruption of the pattern can be seen in ablated embryos at 0 h post-ablation (white dashed outline). By 4 h, and up to 8 h, post-ablation the gene expression pattern is comparable to control embryos. (C) Average map of the sox2 + /tbxta + cells from tailbuds at each time point in control and ablated embryos. The axes show the distribution of these cells in the dorsal-ventral and anterior-posterior axes and the average level of sox2 versus tbxta expression within 11 µm of each point. There is no significant change in the average maps between control and ablated embryos. (D) Number of sox2/tbxta double-positive nuclei in each tailbud. Ablation causes a significant drop in the number of nuclei at 0 h post-ablation compared to controls. A significant reduction remains at 4 h post-ablation compared to controls. 0 h: ablated, n =10; control, n =8. 1 h: ablated, n =11, control, n =9. 4 h: ablated, n =10; control, n =9. 8 h: ablated, n =3; control, n =3. (E) Long-term lightsheet imaging of an ablated embryo (white dashed circle) and a stage-matched control allows manual identification of dividing cells (cyan dashed circles). (F) There is no clear difference between the number of divisions in ablated and control embryos over 4 h. Ablated, n =1; control, n =1. Conditions were compared using Mann–Whitney-Wilcoxon test. * P ≤0.05.

Article Snippet: Images acquired from the Zeiss lattice lightsheet microscope were saved into a single .czi file.

Techniques: Gene Expression, Expressing, Control, Disruption, Imaging, MANN-WHITNEY